My exploration of Genealogy

Home Search Login  
Print Bookmark

Laura May Mayer[1]

Female 1927 - Abt 1950  (23 years)


Personal Information    |    Sources    |    All

  • Name Laura May Mayer  [2, 3, 4] 
    Birth 1927  NUNEATON Warwickshire England Find all individuals with events at this location  [3, 4] 
    Gender Female 
    Residence Abt 1945  Abbey Green, Nuneaton, England Find all individuals with events at this location 
    Met Tom whilst living here, just after the War 
    Death Abt Dec 1950  Nuneaton, Warwickshire, England Find all individuals with events at this location 
    • I am led to believe she had a burst appendix and died as a result when Jane was less than 6 months old. Dec 50 / Jan 51, registered 1Q 1951
    Death Mar 1951  Nuneaton, Warwickshire, England Find all individuals with events at this location  [3] 
    I am led to believe she had a burst appendix and died as a result when Jane was less than 6 months old. Dec 50 / Jan 51, registered 1Q 1951 
    Person ID I1798600980  Hurst Improbable Family Tree
    Last Modified 11 Feb 2022 

    Father James Henry Mayer,   b. Jan 1899, Nuneaton, Warwickshire, England Find all individuals with events at this locationd. Jun 1934, Nuneaton, Warwickshire, England Find all individuals with events at this location (Age 35 years) 
    Mother Florence May Howkins,   b. Abt 1899, Burbage Hinckley. Leicestershire, England Find all individuals with events at this location 
    Marriage 6 Aug 1918  Hinckley, Leicestershire, England Find all individuals with events at this location 
    • St Catherines Burbage
    Family ID F1501  Group Sheet  |  Family Chart

    Family Thomas Ford,   b. Dec 1920, Nuneaton, Warwickshire, England Find all individuals with events at this locationd. 2009, Nuneaton, Warwickshire, England Find all individuals with events at this location (Age 88 years) 
    Family ID F1498  Group Sheet  |  Family Chart
    Last Modified 11 Feb 2022 

  • Sources 
    1. [S-2080810673] Ancestry, (Online publication - Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com. Original data: Family Tree files submitted by Ancestry members.), Ancestry Family Tree.

    2. [S-2081229561] Ancestry.com, England & Wales, Marriage Index: 1916-2005, (Online publication - Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc, 2010.Original data - General Register Office. England and Wales Civil Registration Indexes. London, England: General Register Office. © Crown copyright. Published by permission of the Contr).

    3. [S-2081219493] Ancestry.com, England & Wales, Death Index: 1916-2005, (Online publication - Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations Inc, 2007.Original data - General Register Office. England and Wales Civil Registration Indexes. London, England: General Register Office. © Crown copyright. Published by permission of the Contro).

    4. [S-2080809694] Ancestry.com, England & Wales, Birth Index: 1916-2005, (Online publication - Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations Inc, 2008.Original data - General Register Office. England and Wales Civil Registration Indexes. London, England: General Register Office. © Crown copyright. Published by permission of the Contro).


DNA

DNA testing adds a whole different aspect to Genealogy

You can find relatives you did not know you had, open new branches to your tree, and create validations of people between the match and myself.

Whilst the improbable tree has lots of information yet to be validated, the tree I have created just for DNA matches and the links of ancestors between us, only has spouses that are not in some way validated.

I have started with DNA matches in Ancestry, but will eventually include MyHeritage and GEDmatch matches as well.

A lot to do.

More ...

More background about trees, people, and places

Family Trees can be just a list of people and how they are interrelated.

However they can contain so much more. Records, so many records.

Part of the process of assessment of a record for me, is about location. This takes me into social economic history. In the 19th century, where a lot of our records come from, life was considerably different form today. The very rich could move about the country, and indeed they would with a degree of ease that we have today, albeit on a different timescale. I recently found people on my tree that migrated to North America, and subsequently part of the family moved on to Australia, and set up home there. Shipping passenger records indicate that people from that family frequently visited their relatives both in North America and Britain, before returning to their home in Australia. That was not the lot of the masses though.

More ...

Search

Go back to the rest of my site

Done with looking around this segment, and the database. Perhaps you want to;-

 

 

Go back to Genealogy Home

Go back to Main Website Home