My exploration of Genealogy

Home Search Login  
Print Bookmark

Mark P. Schade Van Westrum

Male


Generations:      Standard    |    Vertical    |    Compact    |    Box    |    Text    |    Ahnentafel    |    Fan Chart    |    Media

More detail
Generation: 1

  1. 1.  Mark P. Schade Van Westrum (son of Anthony Colby S. Van Westrum and Edith H Hartsock).

    Mark married Cathenne J Cox on 15 Sep 1984. [Group Sheet] [Family Chart]


Generation: 2

  1. 2.  Anthony Colby S. Van Westrum was born about 1908; died on 10 Sep 1988.

    Anthony married Edith H Hartsock on 27 Dec 1935. Edith was born on 17 Jan 1915 in New York, New York; died on 29 Dec 2008 in Walla Walla, Washington; was buried in Indianapolis, Indiana. [Group Sheet] [Family Chart]


  2. 3.  Edith H Hartsock was born on 17 Jan 1915 in New York, New York; died on 29 Dec 2008 in Walla Walla, Washington; was buried in Indianapolis, Indiana.
    Children:
    1. 1. Mark P. Schade Van Westrum
    2. Anthony Colby Schade Van Westrum was born on 10 Apr 1944 in Indianapolis, Indiana, USA; died on 20 Jan 2019 in Golden, Colorado.


DNA

DNA testing adds a whole different aspect to Genealogy

You can find relatives you did not know you had, open new branches to your tree, and create validations of people between the match and myself.

Whilst the improbable tree has lots of information yet to be validated, the tree I have created just for DNA matches and the links of ancestors between us, only has spouses that are not in some way validated.

I have started with DNA matches in Ancestry, but will eventually include MyHeritage and GEDmatch matches as well.

A lot to do.

More ...

More background about trees, people, and places

Family Trees can be just a list of people and how they are interrelated.

However they can contain so much more. Records, so many records.

Part of the process of assessment of a record for me, is about location. This takes me into social economic history. In the 19th century, where a lot of our records come from, life was considerably different form today. The very rich could move about the country, and indeed they would with a degree of ease that we have today, albeit on a different timescale. I recently found people on my tree that migrated to North America, and subsequently part of the family moved on to Australia, and set up home there. Shipping passenger records indicate that people from that family frequently visited their relatives both in North America and Britain, before returning to their home in Australia. That was not the lot of the masses though.

More ...

Search

Go back to the rest of my site

Done with looking around this segment, and the database. Perhaps you want to;-

 

 

Go back to Genealogy Home

Go back to Main Website Home