My exploration of Genealogy

Home Search Login  
Print Bookmark

John NATT

Male 1816 -


Generations:      Standard    |    Vertical    |    Compact    |    Box    |    Text    |    Ahnentafel    |    Fan Chart    |    Media

More detail
Generation: 1

  1. 1.  John NATT was born in 1816 in Chatham, Kent, England (son of William NATT and Ann STENTIN).

Generation: 2

  1. 2.  William NATT was born in Abt. 1770 in Cobham, Kent, England (son of William Natt and Sarah GAMBRELL); died on 25 Jul 1839 in Maidstone, Kent, England.

    William married Ann STENTIN on 11 May 1811 in Frindsbury, Kent, England. Ann was born in Abt. 1779 in Middlesex, England. [Group Sheet] [Family Chart]


  2. 3.  Ann STENTIN was born in Abt. 1779 in Middlesex, England.
    Children:
    1. Maria NATT was born in 1812 in Chatham, Kent, England; died in 1831 in Chatham, Kent, England.
    2. Mary Ann NATT was born in 1814 in Chatham, Kent, England.
    3. 1. John NATT was born in 1816 in Chatham, Kent, England.
    4. Ann NATT was born on 14 Feb 1820 in Chatham, Kent, England; died in 1827 in Chatham, Kent, England.
    5. William Walter NATT was born on 17 Oct 1822 in Chatham, Kent, England; died in 1860 in Chatham, Kent, England.


Generation: 3

  1. 4.  William Natt was born on 23 Feb 1745 in Cobham, Kent, England (son of George NATT and Mary Hony); died in 1807 in Cobham, Kent, England.

    William married Sarah GAMBRELL on 04 Jul 1768 in Cobham, Kent, England. Sarah was born in 1747 in Cobham, Kent, England; died in 1819 in Brompton, Kent, England. [Group Sheet] [Family Chart]


  2. 5.  Sarah GAMBRELL was born in 1747 in Cobham, Kent, England; died in 1819 in Brompton, Kent, England.
    Children:
    1. William NATT was born about 1768 in Cobham, Kent, England; died in 1769 in Cobham, Kent, England.
    2. 2. William NATT was born in Abt. 1770 in Cobham, Kent, England; died on 25 Jul 1839 in Maidstone, Kent, England.
    3. Sarah Natt was born in 1771 in Cobham, Kent, England; died in Oct 1837 in Malling, Kent, England.
    4. Frederick NATT was born about 1776 in Luddesdown, Kent, England.
    5. Joseph NATT was born in Nov 1777 in Luddesdown, Kent, England; died on 11 Jan 1816 in Shorne, Kent, England.
    6. Jane NATT was born in 1780 in Luddesdown, Kent, England; died in 1788 in Cobham, Kent, England.
    7. Lydia NATT was born in 1784; died in 1784 in Cobham, Kent, England.
    8. George Natt was born on 6 Mar 1785 in Cobham, Kent, England; died on 15 Oct 1850 in Aylesford, Kent, England.


Generation: 4

  1. 8.  George NATT was born about 1710 in Kent, England; died in 1784 in Cobham, Kent, England.

    George married Mary Hony on 8 Oct 1732 in Luddesdown, Kent, England. Mary was born about 1710 in Kent, England; died in 1782 in Cobham, Kent, England. [Group Sheet] [Family Chart]


  2. 9.  Mary Hony was born about 1710 in Kent, England; died in 1782 in Cobham, Kent, England.
    Children:
    1. George Natt died in 1805 in Shorne, Kent, England.
    2. Mary Natt was born in 1735.
    3. 4. William Natt was born on 23 Feb 1745 in Cobham, Kent, England; died in 1807 in Cobham, Kent, England.


DNA

DNA testing adds a whole different aspect to Genealogy

You can find relatives you did not know you had, open new branches to your tree, and create validations of people between the match and myself.

Whilst the improbable tree has lots of information yet to be validated, the tree I have created just for DNA matches and the links of ancestors between us, only has spouses that are not in some way validated.

I have started with DNA matches in Ancestry, but will eventually include MyHeritage and GEDmatch matches as well.

A lot to do.

More ...

More background about trees, people, and places

Family Trees can be just a list of people and how they are interrelated.

However they can contain so much more. Records, so many records.

Part of the process of assessment of a record for me, is about location. This takes me into social economic history. In the 19th century, where a lot of our records come from, life was considerably different form today. The very rich could move about the country, and indeed they would with a degree of ease that we have today, albeit on a different timescale. I recently found people on my tree that migrated to North America, and subsequently part of the family moved on to Australia, and set up home there. Shipping passenger records indicate that people from that family frequently visited their relatives both in North America and Britain, before returning to their home in Australia. That was not the lot of the masses though.

More ...

Search

Go back to the rest of my site

Done with looking around this segment, and the database. Perhaps you want to;-

 

 

Go back to Genealogy Home

Go back to Main Website Home